Year |
Result |
Note |
2004 |
47.0 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2005 |
53.0 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2006 |
50.0 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2007 |
44.6 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2008 |
46.6 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2009 |
20.1 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2010 |
28.0 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2011 |
34.4 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2012 |
28.1 |
This a workforce measure of the number of wage employees who separated (quit, fired) from the agency in the fiscal year versus the total number of employees employed on the last day of the fiscal year. Various employee retention strategies are being developed/implemented in an effort to reduce the turnover rate for wage employees. |
2013 |
33.8 |
* Turnover is computed by dividing the total number of separations during a period of time, such as a fiscal year by average employment during the same period |
2014 |
31.8 |
* Turnover is computed by dividing the total number of separations during a period of time, such as a fiscal year by average employment during the same period |
2015 |
35.3 |
* Turnover is computed by dividing the total number of separations during a period of time, such as a fiscal year by average employment during the same period |
2016 |
37.4 |
* Turnover is computed by dividing the total number of separations during a period of time, such as a fiscal year by average employment during the same period |
2017 |
48.9 |
* Turnover is computed by dividing the total number of separations during a period of time, such as a fiscal year by average employment during the same period |
2018 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|