Year |
Result |
Note |
2003 |
3,283 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2004 |
657 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2005 |
1,974 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2006 |
462 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2007 |
4,674 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2008 |
4,764 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2009 |
4,239 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2010 |
14,654 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm and production should return closer to the goal in FY 2011. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2011 |
8,872 |
The units produced in this program vary from year to year depending upon the closeout of large projects. The prievious 3 years experienced an increase due to projects being completed above the usual number expected. The number reported in FY 2010 was extremely out of the norm. The Southern Rivers grant program is down to $3.6 M in cash and will be spent in FY 2012. The production will then be more in line with the target. |
2012 |
14,727 |
DHCD continues to make significant investments in improving the reliability and accessibility of water and wastewater systems. Funding for these programs include both state and federal sources, including a one-time allocation of $17 million for the Southern Rivers Watershed Enhancement program. As funding from Southern Rivers is fully expended, the number of households connected to wastewater systems will trend down. Due to the scale of these construction projects, DHCD works very closely with other agencies, such as the Departments of Health and Environmental Quality, along with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), to leverage other resources necessary to bring these projects to completion. |
2013 |
24,996 |
Reports from grant recipients for the Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) which have been reduced by 25 + over several years, Southwest Virginia Water & Wastewater Grant Program, the Southern Rivers Grant program utilizing the Water Quality Improvement Grants which will be expended in FY 2014. Other funds are being reduced such as the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) and HOME federal funds. The results are expected to decrease due to these reductions in funding. |
2014 |
29,800 |
Reports from grant recipients for the Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) which have been reduced by 25 + over several years, Southwest Virginia Water & Wastewater Grant Program, the Southern Rivers Grant program utilizing the Water Quality Improvement Grants which will be expended in FY 2014. Other funds are being reduced such as the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) and HOME federal funds. The results are expected to decrease in future years due to these reductions in funding. |
2015 |
12,708 |
Reports from grant recipients for the Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) which have been reduced by 25 + over several years, Southwest Virginia Water & Wastewater Grant Program which was reduced in FY 15, (the Southern Rivers Grant program utilizing the Water Quality Improvement Grants which was finally all expended in FY 2014). Other funds are being reduced such as the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) and HOME federal funds. The results are expected to decrease in future years due to these reductions in funding |
2016 |
17,603 |
Reports from grant recipients for the Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) which have been reduced by 25 + over several years, Southwest Virginia Water & Wastewater Grant Program which was reduced in FY 15, Other funds are being reduced such as the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) and HOME federal funds. The results are expected to decrease in future years due to these reductions in funding. Although FY 2016 reflects a 28+ increase in the number of households. The scope of the benefits may vary greatly from year to year depending on the number of projects that are funded in each PDC and the size of the projects. Some projects may be small and only address a very defined area of a few homes, while others may cover a locality’s entire water system thus benefitting all their customers. |
2017 |
7,322 |
The scope of the benefits to households varies from year to year depending on the number of projects that are funded in each planning district and the size of the projects. CDBG projects are flexible in terms of type of project which leads to variation in the number of water/wastewater projects, regardless of funding level. Some projects may be small and only address a very defined area of a few homes, while others may cover a locality’s entire water system thus benefitting all their customers. There were no large scale water/wastewater projects in FY2017. |
2018 |
17,418 |
FY18 reflects a 138+ increase in the number of households with new or improved access to water/wastewater. This increase is attributed to the increase of CDBG funds expended on infrastructure improvements in FY18, whereas FY18 funds for water/wastewater were expended on the planning phase. |
2019 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|